Impact of triple intrathecal prophylaxis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia adults receiving HyperCVAD: A COVID-19 practice change.

Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) requires both systemically and locally directed therapies to prevent central nervous system (CNS) recurrence. In response to restrictions brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, our institution adopted triple intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy for CNS prophylaxis during HyperCVAD (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine). We retrospectively reviewed records of newly diagnosed adult all patients who were consecutively treated with HyperCVAD between January 2011 and July 2022. Outcomes of patients who received triple IT chemotherapy and standard of care (SOC) CNS prophylaxis were compared. The primary endpoint was CNS relapse-free survival (RFS) while secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of relapse, overall survival, number of outpatient, and total ITs per patient, and CNS treatment-related toxicities. A total of 37 patients including 21 in the triple IT and 16 in the SOC cohorts were evaluated. There were no differences between the triple IT and SOC cohorts with respect to CNS-RFS (89.6% vs. 80.4%; HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.45-5.39; p = .49), cumulative incidence of relapse (8.9% vs. 19.6%; HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.3-5.3; p = .87), and overall survival (89.6% vs. 85.7%; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.20-4.21; p = .90) at 2-years. Significantly fewer IT doses were administered in the triple IT cohort (p = .011) and the number of additional outpatient appointments to administer IT chemotherapy were markedly reduced as 98.6% of IT doses were administered during scheduled admissions compared to 76.8% (p < .001). The adoption of triple IT chemotherapy did not increase CNS treatment-related toxicities but rather, the inverse was observed. Triple IT chemotherapy during HyperCVAD represents a feasible alternative to SOC CNS prophylaxis, especially during times of resource restriction and when minimization of patient exposures is desired.

Diminished Humoral and Cellular Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Prior publications have demonstrated low rates of seroconversion to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this national collaboration of 11 cancer centers around the United States, we aimed to further characterize and understand the vaccine-induced immune response, including T-cell responses and the impact of CLL therapeutics (NCT04852822). Eligible patients were enrolled into two cohorts: 1) at the time of the initial vaccination and 2) at the time of booster vaccination. Serologic response rates (anti-S) from the 210 patients in the initial vaccination cohort and 117 in the booster vaccination cohort were 56% (95% CI, 50-63%) and 68% (95% CI, 60-77%), respectively. Compared to patients not on therapy, those receiving B-cell-directed therapy were less likely to seroconvert (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.49). Persistence of response was seen at 6 months;anti-S titers increased with administration of booster vaccinations. In the initial vaccination cohort, positive correlations were seen between quantitative serologic response and CD4 T-cell response for the Wuhan variant and to a lesser degree, for the Omicron variant (Spearman ρ = 0.45 for Wuhan, ρ = 0.25 for Omicron). In the booster vaccination cohort, positive correlations were seen between serologic response and CD4 T-cell responses for both variants (ρ = 0.58 Wuhan, ρ= 0.57 Omicron) and to a lesser degree for CD8 T-cell responses (ρ = 0.33 Wuhan, ρ = 0.22 Omicron). While no deaths from COVID-19 were reported after booster vaccinations, patients should use caution as newer variants emerge and escape vaccine-induced immunity.

Diminished Humoral and Cellular Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Prior publications have demonstrated low rates of seroconversion to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this national collaboration of 11 cancer centers around the United States, we aimed to further characterize and understand the vaccine-induced immune response, including T-cell responses and the impact of CLL therapeutics (NCT04852822). Eligible patients were enrolled into two cohorts: 1) at the time of the initial vaccination and 2) at the time of booster vaccination. Serologic response rates (anti-S) from the 210 patients in the initial vaccination cohort and 117 in the booster vaccination cohort were 56% (95% CI, 50-63%) and 68% (95% CI, 60-77%), respectively. Compared to patients not on therapy, those receiving B-cell-directed therapy were less likely to seroconvert (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.49). Persistence of response was seen at 6 months; anti-S titers increased with administration of booster vaccinations. In the initial vaccination cohort, positive correlations were seen between quantitative serologic response and CD4 T-cell response for the Wuhan variant and to a lesser degree, for the Omicron variant (Spearman P = 0.45 for Wuhan, P = 0.25 for Omicron). In the booster vaccination cohort, positive correlations were seen between serologic response and CD4 T-cell responses for both variants (P = 0.58 Wuhan, P = 0.57 Omicron) and to a lesser degree for CD8 T-cell responses (P = 0.33 Wuhan, P = 0.22 Omicron). While no deaths from COVID-19 were reported after booster vaccinations, patients should use caution as newer variants emerge and escape vaccine-induced immunity.